WWF report finds 60% of global biodiversity loss is down to meat-based diets which put huge strain on Earth’s resources.
The ongoing global appetite for meat is having a devastating impact on the environment driven by the production of crop-based feed for animals, a new report has warned.
Quote of the article: “But if global demand for meat grows as expected, the report says, soy production would need to increase by nearly 80% by 2050.”
Article by Jerome Roos (PDR Cambridge, founder and editor of ROAR magazine), in ROAR issue #4
A concise account of the current state of (drum-roll) state control in neoliberal systems, exemplified by armed riot polices opposing civilians, mass storage of personal data, and the phenomenon of handling disorder (aka consequences and symptoms) rather than bringing order (aka addressing root-causes and improving these).
On his argument that private companies are increasingly profiting from the increaseing state-control (data mining, private military forces), Roos remains a bit vague and, especially towards the end, the article carries a slight conspiracy-esque character when it paints its doom and gloom scenario.
The management of disorder — this becomes the main paradigm of government under neoliberalism. Rather than directly confronting the underlying causes of political instability, ecological catastrophe or endemic social ills, the state of control considers it “safer and more useful to try to govern the effects.”
Convincing argument outlining how American Liberalism’s model of corporate freedom at all costs combined with Philanthropism is rather a symptom of inequality than a promising cure. However, the author misses to highlight another point: that Liberalism’s promise that everyone has the chance to “make it to the top” is a mere illusion.
Nothing new really, but interesting that the push comes from global institutions and is specifically geared towards Western societies.
Everything in the social world is contingent. All the institutions we’re part of, the norms we follow and the practices we adopt could all be different because they were made by human beings. They only stay the same because people continue to act as they do. If that stopped, everything would change. (https://www.opendemocracy.net/transformation/luke-billingham/it-could-be-otherwise-contingency-and-social-transformation)
The past is narrated and the future is not fixed – Spot-on! On that note, also worth referring to Adorno’s Society and work in general (“Everything under the sun is socially-mediated”), Benjamin’s Thesis on the Concept of History, and Foucault’s The Order of Things and work in general.
I haven’t seen it yet but thought about sharing it with you – I guess it is going to be at least interesting and something to think about.
Click here – 350.org Disobedience